Information is not intelligence
Thomas Lindqvist · @thomaslindqvist
Ur SSWC-boken 2010, s. 310–312 · Läs boken som PDF
One of the ways that I earn my keep is by gathering and processing information. Basically I try to keep an eye out for information that can be of value for my employer. I do this through the usual channels. I have my RSS feeds, I follow interesting people on Twitter, I read relevant publications and books online or offline. Sometimes I pursue threads that lead me to research papers, and sometimes I end up reading fashion blogs. I follow topics, conversations and people.
Information is currency, but almost all the information I get my hands on is out there for everyone and anyone to find. I guess it does take some skill and experience finding, filtering and evaluating information, but it’s hardly rocket surgery.
The hard part comes later when you try to make sense of it all. But surprisingly, it is not uncommon for the whole process to grind to a halt after the information has been gathered. Now that, I don’t get. Serving people with information without aiding them in ways such as putting the info in perspective, in context and then stepping up and proposing strategies and directions, is really a half ass effort. It’s luke warm.
To me this is obvious since I’m always interested in generated value – the end game of things. Not everyone feel that they can afford the luxury of applying a whole system approach to information and intelligence. But this is because we only value the outcome of the every day grind, and we only value this because we have found a way to measure it. That which we measure, we choose to think of as extremely important.
But by making your Competitive Intelligence process more lucid, you can measure it, and when you do you begin to see that the process of turning information into intelligence is at the very core of your business. You make your most important decisions based on the outcome of this process. How can you not want to get this right?
The whole chain of Competitive Intelligence is really a six step process:
- Gather – What’s going on?
- Analyze – But what ever does it mean?
- Focus – What does this mean for us?
- Suggest – Based on the above I suggest we do this: X, Y and Z.
- Act – Do X, Y and Z.
- Evaluate - In what way did doing X, Y and Z bring us any closer to our goal?
The chain of events – Information becomes Intelligence becomes Action. And then we evaluate and loop.
Consider this: Information not processed and acted upon is only of value for those who buy and sell information, i.e for those whose end game is the info in itself.
Doesn’t that make you think of shady characters in old movies, you know, those creepy fellows with a cigarette but in the corner of their mouths? And they say to the cop that they’ve got a hot tip that will move the investigation along. A hard boiled dialogue always follows, and it ends with:
– But it’s gonna cost you another five bucks Mr…
– You filthy swine!
The cop reluctantly pulls out his wallet, and the information creep grins and grabs the fiver with his dirty paw. And then he says something along the lines of “go ask big daddy kingpin”, and then he scurries into the night, not giving a hoot for the rest of the story.
Now that’s no way to run a business.
Getting this process right has never been more important than today. New information is generated at such back breaking speed that it can easily freak you out and make you lose your way. If you allow this process to float around in an ad hoc manner, which is not unusual, I suggest you think again.
Competitive Intelligence needs to be a prioritized process. It needs to be deliberate. And it needs to be embedded as an integral part of your day to day operations.
THOMAS LINDQVIST — DÅ
Texten finns publicerad på: http://www.thomaslindqvist.com/blogg/uncategorized/back-to-work http://korta.nu/sswc10_72
Thomas works as a manager of all sorts of things at Menyou Tech Dev in Stockholm Sweden. Web: www.thomaslindqvist.com | Mail: thomas@thomaslindqvist.com | Twitter: @thomaslindqvist
THOMAS LINDQVIST — IDAG
Efterforskat juli 2026 · AI-underlag med källänkar
Senior Director Organizational Development, King
Från omvärldsbevakning till organisationsutveckling i spelbranschen. Efter Menyou-åren i Stockholm (production manager 2008–2010, product manager 2010–2012 — exakt den roll han beskriver i boken) blev han agil coach hos bland andra Truecaller, Toca Boca, Hyper Island, Berghs och Spotify (2016–2019), innan han 2018 gick till King, studion bakom Candy Crush.
Brev från 2026
En AI har läst texten från 2010 och föreställer sig – varsamt och med glimten i ögat – hur Thomas Lindqvist kanske skulle svara idag. Det här är INTE Thomas Lindqvists egna ord.
Back in 2010 I worried that we gathered information and then stopped, as if the gathering were the point. I had no idea how literal that worry would become. Today machines read everything for us — every feed, every report, every fashion blog — and summarize it before breakfast. The first step of my six, the one I called easy, has been automated into thin air.
And yet. Analyze, focus, suggest, act, evaluate — that loop is still where the value hides, and still where the process stalls. We renamed a few things along the way: the word intelligence picked up a prefix, and the shady informant with the cigarette became an API with a subscription fee. But 'what does this mean for us?' remains a question no tool answers on its own.
If I could send one line back to the fellow typing that essay, it would be this: you picked the right hill. Information was never the scarce thing. Judgment, context and the nerve to act on a conclusion — that was the whole game then, and it still is.
Är det din text? Skriv ditt riktiga svar – mejla joakim@jardenberg.com – så ersätter vi AI:ns brev med ditt.
Drömmarna i den här texten
Gathering is easy – making sense is the hard part
Slog inSixteen years later, machines gather and summarize the world's information in seconds – and his point stands taller than ever: the sense-making is still the scarce part. The title alone reads like a thesis statement for the AI age, written before anyone asked what intelligence actually is. Six steps from information to action, drafted long before anyone said 'agent'.
AI-underlag med källänkar, utkast juli 2026. Se hela scoreboarden på /drommarna.